Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting restriction?
bet9ja.com
By Natalie Sherman
bit.ly
Business press reporter, New york city
bet9ja.com
A ban on sports betting in the majority of US states could be overturned by a case being thought about by the Supreme Court.

The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mostly disallowed sports betting, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" issue.

The case, which began on Monday, follows New Jersey citizens enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting wagering.
bet9ja.com
A group of sports betting leagues opposes wagering on games, which they fear will encourage match-fixing.

Lower courts have consistently ruled against New Jersey, stating it is within the federal government's power to restrict a state's policy choices.

The Supreme Court opted to hear the case nevertheless in the middle of a larger shift in American mindsets toward gaming.

Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.

But over the last few years, states starving for tax revenue in the wake of the have enacted a rash of looser gambling laws, gathering significant levies on sports betting revenue.

There are now 24 states with industrial gambling establishments - approximately double the number a decade ago.

Despite the official restriction, which already exempts Nevada and 3 other states, illegal sports betting is swarming in the US.

Americans position about $154bn in illegal sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
bit.ly
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, described the federal ban, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.

It states the UK is an example of a country where sports betting wagering is prevalent.

"It's time for Washington to stop denying states of vital tax income and allow them to reap the rewards of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.

More than 15 states submitted papers in assistance of New Jersey in the event. A handful have actually currently passed laws to authorise sports betting in case of a change.

'Times have actually changed'
bit.ly
On Monday, as attorneys began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.

The court is expected to decide in June 2018.

"If we succeed here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within 2 weeks of a choice by the court," said outbound New Jersey governor Chris Christie after attending the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're ready to go."
bit.ly
Regardless of the court's final ruling, Congress may likewise use up the debate in the middle of more comprehensive conversation about online video gaming and e-sports betting.

Even a few of the expert sports betting leagues have begun to change their positions on the concern of sports betting.

Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would produce an uniform set of rules throughout the US. "Times have altered," he composed in a 2014 opinion piece, external.

Addicts struggling with mobile sports betting

3 October 2017

The tricky problem of issue sports betting

31 August 2017